Water Board Meeting
Darren Burkhart, HNTB, provided an update on the Broadway and 10th Street project, stating that they are currently waiting on their INDOT permit. He stated that he is working with INDOT to address any concerns or questions they may have.
Aaron Schwendenmann presented a contract for a backflow program, which is a five-year agreement that will be paid annually. The board approved this contract.
Aaron also presented a contract for a 120 Water agreement that will help his team track requirements that become effective on Nov. 1, 2027. These requirements are related to lead and copper tracking. This is a two-year contract. The board approved this contract.
Aaron stated that his MRO has been submitted to the board and that operations at the plant were normal. He added that he submitted the 2025 CCR Report, which has been approved by IDEM.
Board of Aviation Meeting
The board began their meeting by reviewing previous meeting minutes and financial reports.
The board heard from Amy Bornes, Clerk-Treasurer, who provided information about their JCB loan. She stated that the loan is very close to being paid off and that she is currently waiting for a few final payouts so she can make another significant payment.
The board approved an updated agreement for renting farmland to Jay Hatton. The update corrected a clerical error stating that he was renting 55 acres; he is actually renting 56 acres at $125 per acre.
The board received their monthly engineering report, which required no action. Within the report, they noted that they are waiting on a few closeout documents and additional funding from recent projects.
Gary Bailey, Airport Manager, provided his report. He stated that INDOT performed an inspection in February, and they passed with no concerns. Gary also stated that he submitted a required annual report to the state. He provided updates on projects and improvements he has been working on since being named manager. He added that he has signed up for and will participate in a fuel safety course.
The board approved their claims.
Redevelopment Commission Meeting
Zach Wirrig, Director of Projects, stated that he received a draft of the Retail Gap Analysis being created for the city to help identify gaps and needs within the community. This analysis will assist the city, county, and Economic Development Corporation in attracting new businesses and retail. Zach stated that feedback and suggestions were provided and that an updated draft is expected this week.
Gabe Nobbe, Decatur County Commissioner, returned to the commission to reduce his funding request for the Allen Memorial Pool Project. Originally, Gabe requested $1 million. He stated that the project continues to move forward with an approximate opening date of June 1, 2026. He described the pool as a “major quality-of-life improvement for the community.”
Gabe stated that through fundraisers, donations, sponsorships, and community support, they have raised $3,978,056.20 toward the project. Their goal remains $4.5 million. He requested that the commission contribute $250,000, to be paid over the next three years.
The commission voted to pledge $250,000 as a one-time payment toward the pool project.
Zach Wirrig also updated the commission, stating that Iron Men has submitted their sale and transfer agreement. This marks a major milestone for the project’s development.
The commission approved their claims.
City of Greensburg Board of Zoning Appeals
The meeting began with public hearings for the following requests:
Kyle Smith, 214 S. Vine St., requested a variance for an additional accessory structure on his property. An attendee asked what the structure would be, and it was explained that it would be a 12 ft. x 20 ft. greenhouse.
Lauren Obendorf, Green Signs, requested a variance for total cumulative sign area for two signs at 119 N. Broadway. No comments or concerns were presented. This is for a new business coming to Greensburg. Plans include a building-mounted sign and a flag-style sign extending from the building.
Travis and Amanda Rich, 910 S. Lynn Rd., requested a variance from setback requirements for an accessory structure. No comments or concerns were presented. They plan to replace their existing shed with a slightly larger structure.
Michelle Roberts-Schneider, All 4 Kids, 422 E. Central Ave., requested a variance for a sign type in an R-2 zoning district. No comments or concerns were presented. The sign will be for the business located at the Greensburg Learning Center near Door 9.
Following the public hearings, the board reviewed additional details for each request. All requests were approved.
Plan Commission Meeting
The meeting began with a public hearing for the following request:
Nathan Capelo, owner of Greensburg Mobile Home Park, LLC, at 310 E. Fourth St., requested to rezone the property from R-2 (One- or Two-Family Residential) to R-4 (Medium-Density Multi-Family Residential).
An attendee asked what the change would mean for the neighborhood. The board explained that the owner intends to remove the existing trailers and construct townhouses. Another attendee raised concerns about runoff and sewer usage. The board stated that the developer will be required to follow regulations to address these concerns.
Nathan stated that he has owned the mobile home park for seven years and focuses on revitalizing communities. He said the condition of the property has made it difficult to continue operating as a mobile home park, citing low demand. He stated that, unfortunately, “it’s not a property that I am proud to own.”
He explained that his vision is to create a small community with higher-quality housing options. At maximum, he anticipates developing 24 units. He emphasized that the townhomes will be designed to fit within the surrounding neighborhood, potentially as two-story units with one to two bedrooms and possibly garages. These will be market-rate units, approximately 1,000 square feet each. He hopes to begin the project this year.
The commission voted unanimously to send a favorable recommendation to the City Council.
The commission also reviewed current plan fees and voted to add a provision stating that if a developer withdraws a project after review, they will still be responsible for review costs.
